The conflict of interests raised by CTA technology is motivated by the risk of
harm that results from the clash of two intuitively opposing and mutually
exclusive moral obligations: the moral obligation to contribute to, or at least not
obstruct human collective wellbeing, versus the moral obligation to protect
people’s individual privacy and autonomy.
Sharing personal information by means of CTA technology may pose a risk to the
individual user’s privacy, while refusing to use the CTA may pose a risk to
society’s collective efforts to curb the spread of the global COVID-19 pandemic. I
will in what follows analyse and evaluate both claims, and attempt to reconcile the
deontological rights and duties these claims imply with the harmful and beneficial
consequences they (may) cause, in an attempt to formulate a reasonable
compromise as justification for why everyone that can afford it ought to
contribute to CTA technology.